Links
Home
Oracle DBA Forum
Frequent Oracle Errors
TNS:could not resolve the connect identifier specified
Backtrace message unwound by exceptions
invalid identifier
PL/SQL compilation error
internal error
missing expression
table or view does not exist
end-of-file on communication channel
TNS:listener unknown in connect descriptor
insufficient privileges
PL/SQL: numeric or value error string
TNS:protocol adapter error
ORACLE not available
target host or object does not exist
invalid number
unable to allocate string bytes of shared memory
resource busy and acquire with NOWAIT specified
error occurred at recursive SQL level string
ORACLE initialization or shutdown in progress
archiver error. Connect internal only, until freed
snapshot too old
unable to extend temp segment by string in tablespace
Credential retrieval failed
missing or invalid option
invalid username/password; logon denied
unable to create INITIAL extent for segment
out of process memory when trying to allocate string bytes
shared memory realm does not exist
cannot insert NULL
TNS:unable to connect to destination
remote database not found'>ora-02019
exception encountered: core dump
inconsistent datatypes
no data found
TNS:operation timed out
PL/SQL: could not find program
existing state of packages has been discarded
maximum number of processes exceeded
error signaled in parallel query server
ORACLE instance terminated. Disconnection forced
TNS:packet writer failure
see ORA-12699
missing right parenthesis
name is already used by an existing object
cannot identify/lock data file
invalid file operation
quoted string not properly terminated
DATAFILE??

DATAFILE??

2005-10-19       - By Igor Neyman

Reply:     <<     11     12     13     14     15     16     17     18     19     20     >>  

No bashing from here.
Completely agree.

Igor

__ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____

From: oracle-l-bounce@(protected)
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@(protected)] On Behalf Of Richard Ji
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 1:56 PM
To: bob_murching@(protected)
Cc: cmarquez@(protected); rjsearle@(protected); Oracle Mailing List
Subject: Re: DATAFILE??


Alright, I will get bashed by saying this, but so what.  This list used
to
have a lot of experts and I mean very experts in the Oracle field.  I
am seeing a trend where the experts on this list is writing less and
less.
And maybe it's because they are all just too busy, but I think part of
it is because
this list has turn into a more newbie list and not everyone has Tom Kyte
patience answering newbie questions.  I remember there was a discussion
a while ago about creating a separate list for entry level questions and
the mid-level
to advanced discussions, but it got nowhere.

I am not sure how we can collectively balance out as you suggested.
Should we take turns ask one mid to advanced question for every newbie
question posted to keep this list interesting?

Richard


On 10/19/05, Murching, Bob <bob_murching@(protected)> wrote:

  I don't mind occasional questions whose answers can be searched.
The vast majority of questions asked here could be answered by searching
the net, if not tahiti then one of the many sites that Google indexes.
Besides, when someone asks a question whose answer is reasonably well
known, usually two things very good things happen:
 
  1. Many subscribers learn something that we might not otherwise
have learned if the question had never been asked---irrespective of
whether or not the answer is in the Oracle manual!  
 
  2. People with midrange skill sets get to exercise their ability
to communicate, answer questions, help others out.  If "RTFM and only
come here if the answer is not in the manual nor online" is the policy
of this list, then this list becomes the exclusive domain of questions
that only experts can answer.  I don't see that as anything to be
particularly proud of.  Dialogue and traffic on the mundane generally is
of greater benefit than being a witness to the esoteric.
 
  If it's really egregious then it needs to be put to a stop, and
that balance is something we collectively have to work out amongst
ourselves.  I don't think we should err to either extreme, however, and
in fact I think the current makeup of questions on this list is pretty
good.



<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2769" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=008531318-19102005><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>No bashing from here.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=008531318-19102005><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>Completely agree.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=008531318-19102005>Igor</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> oracle-l-bounce@(protected)
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@(protected)] <B>On Behalf Of </B>Richard
Ji<BR><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, October 19, 2005 1:56 PM<BR><B>To:</B>
bob_murching@(protected)<BR><B>Cc:</B> cmarquez@(protected);
rjsearle@(protected); Oracle Mailing List<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re:
DATAFILE??<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>Alright, I will get bashed by saying this, but so what.&nbsp; This
list used to<BR>have a lot of experts and I mean very experts in the Oracle
field.&nbsp; I<BR>am seeing a trend where the experts on this list is writing
less and less.<BR>And maybe it's because they are all just too busy, but I
think
part of it is because<BR>this list has turn into a more newbie list and not
everyone has Tom Kyte<BR>patience answering newbie questions.&nbsp; I remember
there was a discussion<BR>a while ago about creating a separate list for entry
level questions and the mid-level<BR>to advanced discussions, but it got
nowhere.<BR><BR>I am not sure how we can collectively balance out as you
suggested.<BR>Should we take turns ask one mid to advanced question for every
newbie<BR>question posted to keep this list interesting?<BR><BR>Richard<BR><BR>
<DIV><SPAN class=gmail_quote>On 10/19/05, <B class=gmail_sendername>Murching,
Bob</B> &lt;<A
href="mailto:bob_murching@(protected)">bob_murching@(protected)</A>&gt;
wrote:</SPAN>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=gmail_quote
style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(204,204
,204) 1px solid">
 <DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>I don't
 mind occasional questions whose answers can be searched.&nbsp; The vast
 majority of questions asked here could be answered by searching the net, if
 not tahiti then one of the many sites that Google indexes.&nbsp; Besides,
when
 someone asks a question whose answer is reasonably well known, usually two
 things very good things happen:</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
 <DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
 size=2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
 <DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>1. Many
 subscribers learn something that we might not otherwise have learned if the
 question had never been asked---irrespective of whether or not the answer is
 in the Oracle manual!&nbsp; </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
 <DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
 size=2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
 <DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>2. People
 with midrange skill sets get to exercise their ability to communicate, answer
 questions, help others out.&nbsp; If "RTFM and only come here if the answer
is
 not in the manual nor online" is the policy of this list, then this list
 becomes the exclusive domain of questions that only experts can answer.&nbsp;
 I don't see that as anything to be particularly proud of.&nbsp; Dialogue and
 traffic on the mundane generally is of greater benefit than being a witness
to
 the esoteric.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
 <DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
 size=2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
 <DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>If it's
 really egregious then it needs to be put to a stop, and that balance is
 something we collectively have to work out amongst ourselves.&nbsp; I don't
 think we should err to either extreme, however, and in fact I think the
 current makeup of questions on this list is pretty
good.</FONT></SPAN></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR></BODY></HTML>