.ora-code.com

Links
Home
Oracle DBA Forum
Frequent Oracle Errors
TNS:could not resolve the connect identifier specified
Backtrace message unwound by exceptions
invalid identifier
PL/SQL compilation error
internal error
missing expression
table or view does not exist
end-of-file on communication channel
TNS:listener unknown in connect descriptor
insufficient privileges
PL/SQL: numeric or value error string
TNS:protocol adapter error
ORACLE not available
target host or object does not exist
invalid number
unable to allocate string bytes of shared memory
resource busy and acquire with NOWAIT specified
error occurred at recursive SQL level string
ORACLE initialization or shutdown in progress
archiver error. Connect internal only, until freed
snapshot too old
unable to extend temp segment by string in tablespace
Credential retrieval failed
missing or invalid option
invalid username/password; logon denied
unable to create INITIAL extent for segment
out of process memory when trying to allocate string bytes
shared memory realm does not exist
cannot insert NULL
TNS:unable to connect to destination
remote database not found'>ora-02019
exception encountered: core dump
inconsistent datatypes
no data found
TNS:operation timed out
PL/SQL: could not find program
existing state of packages has been discarded
maximum number of processes exceeded
error signaled in parallel query server
ORACLE instance terminated. Disconnection forced
TNS:packet writer failure
see ORA-12699
missing right parenthesis
name is already used by an existing object
cannot identify/lock data file
invalid file operation
quoted string not properly terminated
DATAFILE??

DATAFILE??

2005-10-19       - By Murching, Bob
Reply:     <<     21     22     23     24     25     26     27     28     29     30     >>  

> I am not sure how we can collectively balance out as you suggested.
>  Should we take turns ask one mid to advanced question for every newbie
>  question posted to keep this list interesting?

First, for the record, I agree with much of what you said; the concern I
have is that this list isn't necessary "better" if it concerns only
questions that less than 20 people on the planet are qualified to answer.
Some of the best discussion I see here begins rather innocuously with a
newbie question that evolves into something much more interesting... people
read the original question and ask it again but with a different spin.  Some
of these innocent questions have led to the so-called experts disagreeing
with each other and making for some interesting debate.  It would be a shame
to see all that gone.  The best signal sometimes comes with a little bit of
noise.

To answer your question.... absolutely.  That's exactly what people should
be doing.  The list is what its members make it.  If you feel that the
content doesn't meet a certain bar, then raise the bar by asking tough
questions or offering answers of a caliber that you feel should set the
standard.  Or take the newbie question and rephrase it in a way that takes
it to the "next level" (whatever that may mean.)

Bob

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">


<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2769" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><FONT size=2><SPAN class=411544318-19102005><FONT
face=Arial color=#0000ff>&nbsp;<FONT face="Times New Roman" color=#000000>&gt;
</FONT></FONT></SPAN>I am not sure how we can collectively balance out as you
suggested.<BR><SPAN class=411544318-19102005><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff>&nbsp;<FONT face="Times New Roman" color=#000000>&gt;
</FONT>&nbsp;</FONT></SPAN>Should we take turns ask one mid to advanced
question
for every newbie<BR><SPAN class=411544318-19102005><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff>&nbsp;<FONT face="Times New Roman" color=#000000>&gt;
</FONT>&nbsp;</FONT></SPAN>question posted to keep this list
interesting?<BR><SPAN class=411544318-19102005><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff>&nbsp;</FONT></SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><FONT size=2><SPAN class=411544318-19102005><FONT
face=Arial color=#0000ff>First, for the record, I agree with much of what you
said;&nbsp;the concern I have is that this list isn't necessary "better" if it
concerns only questions that less than 20 people on the planet are qualified to
answer.&nbsp; Some of the best discussion I see here begins rather innocuously
with a newbie question that evolves into something much more interesting...
people read the original question and ask it again but with a different
spin.&nbsp; Some of these innocent questions have led to the so-called experts
disagreeing with each other and making for some interesting debate.&nbsp; It
would be a shame to see all that gone.&nbsp; The best signal sometimes comes
with a little bit of noise.</FONT></SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=411544318-19102005></SPAN></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=411544318-19102005>To answer your question.... absolutely.&nbsp; That's
exactly what people should be doing.&nbsp; The list is what its members make
it.&nbsp; If you feel that the content doesn't meet a certain bar, then raise
the bar by asking tough questions or offering answers of a caliber that you
feel
should set the standard.&nbsp; Or take the newbie question and rephrase it in a
way that takes it to the "next level" (whatever that may
mean.)</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=411544318-19102005></SPAN></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=411544318-19102005>Bob</SPAN></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>